Shahrukh Khan is questioned for 2 hours by an immigration official at the Chicago airport. Lo and behold! It becomes national news, and for 3 continuous days at that .
Let me get this straight, 1 billion people have nothing better to do with their lives than weep and wail and feel sorry for the actor. At least, that's what the mainstream, populist media thinks, feeding us with the same boring news again and again.
One of our ministers has the gall to proclaim "Tit-for-Tat":"Lets do the same thing to them". Is she out of her mind ?? Sheesh ! What are we - a nation of immature schoolkids - trying to pull each others' hair over a piece of chocolate ? Grow up, Minister. We are 62 years old, you know.
Just to refresh your memory Madam Minister, the immigration official was only doing what he was trained to do - his job. And in case you didn't know, it is
his country.
This episode makes me wonder why celebrities in India are so unaccostomed to security procedures. Clearly, it is to do with the demi-god status they enjoy wherever they travel in India. If Sharukh Khan takes a domestic flight in India, most ground-staff at the airport will practically be salivating to get a glimpse of him. What do you expect the poor security officials to do ? The last thing on their minds would be their jobs. They would rather be thrusting pieces of paper for autographs!
Let me confess - I am not very different from these people. You see, when Aamir Khan and Madhavan were in IIMB to shoot a movie, I waited patiently for their badminton match to get over just to get a photo clicked with them. It is the herd mentality, I plead guilty on all counts.
That brings me to the fundamental question :
In modern society, why are movie actors given so much of importance ? Of all professions, movie-acting gets paid , written and talked about the most.
Why ? What underlying sociological phenomenon is at work here ?
To me, the answer lies in the skewed direction in which the whole concept of entertainment has begun to move.
Lets pause here and rewind our clocks to, say, the 12th Century. What was the idea of entertainment back then ?
Not very different from today - There was art : dance, music , theatre and there was literature and sports. But the crucial difference was that there
people had more time on their hands to savour these creations.
A direct consequence was that there was a more honest appreciation of these art forms than there is today. Our ancestors had the time to study, reflect and ponder a writer's work - so 'Art' was clearly more important than the 'Artist' himself . For example, the story and the creativity behind it was more important than who actually enacted the play.
Fast forward to today's fast-paced life : Entertainment has a very very narrow definition. Literature has taken a backseat. There are two main recurring themes : a) "Television" b) "movies". Fast entertainment. That is really the operative word :
fast.
It is so easy to entertain yourself with the idiot box. All you need to do is sit in front of it and switch it on. How easy can that be !
No wonder we do it over and over again.
Naturally, if you spend an inordinate amount of time watching TV and movies, the characters within those movies become larger-than-life images. It is not their fault, they can't help it.
And when these people, read actors, are always on the top of your mind, you begin to fantasize on how they 'look' outside their screen lives. So if you hear they are somewhere around, you badly want to catch a glimpse of them. The problem is that this whole thing becomes self-reinforcing since everyone around you is going through the same experience. And then there is the whole fantasy of imagining how it would be to lead the life of one of them.
Celebrities....we need to ask ourselves what are we really celebrating ?
[ Oh I almost forgot, when is 'My name is Khan' releasing ? ]